Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:43

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Knicks Notes: Kidd, Coaching Search, Offseason, Thibodeau - Hoops Rumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Is modular building a fix for NY's housing crisis? State officials hope so. - Gothamist
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Florida Panthers vs Edmonton Oilers Prediction 6/14/25 NHL Picks - PickDawgz
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The Nippon Steel Deal: A Master Class in Winning the Working Class - The Free Press